Which term refers to a broad statement made based on insufficient examples or evidence?

The term that refers to a broad statement made based on insufficient examples or evidence is a generalization. Generalizations involve forming conclusions or assumptions about a group or situation based on limited observations or examples. While they can sometimes be accurate, generalizations often lead to oversimplifications or inaccuracies, as they do not take into account the full scope of evidence or nuances in the subject matter.

In contrast, red herrings are distractions that divert attention from the main issue, while logical fallacies encompass a wide range of reasoning errors that can undermine the validity of an argument. Non sequiturs refer to conclusions or statements that do not logically follow from the previous argument or statement. None of these terms adequately captures the essence of making broad claims on insufficient evidence as effectively as generalization does.