Which structural similarity exists between expository and persuasive writing?

Expository writing and persuasive writing share a structural similarity in that both types often involve a clear presentation of ideas and an organizational framework that includes claims and supporting details. Specifically, expository writing typically presents information, explains concepts, or describes processes, while persuasive writing aims to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint or argument. In both instances, there is a focus on effectively communicating ideas, making claims, and backing them with analysis or evidence. This reflects the structural relationship where expository writing can mirror the claim and analysis found in persuasive writing, as both need to present coherent arguments, regardless of their intent.

Other choices suggest incorrect features of these writing styles. For instance, the notion that both avoid the use of evidence undermines the importance of supporting information in both forms. Similarly, claiming both follow a narrative storytelling format misrepresents the objectives of writing in both categories, while saying that persuasive writing only uses facts simplifies the complexity of persuasive writing, which may also involve emotional appeals and ethical considerations.