Which of the following statements offers irrelevant evidence in an argument against giving children allowances?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the TEAS ATI Reading Test. Prepare thoroughly with multiple-choice questions and detailed explanations. Boost your reading comprehension skills for success!

The statement about 50 years ago, when giving children allowances of a quarter a week was common, presents historical context rather than supporting or contesting the argument against giving allowances today. This information does not directly pertain to the current implications or consequences of providing allowances to children, making it irrelevant to the argument being made.

The focus of the argument against allowances is typically based on their current impact on children’s financial behavior, responsibility, and work ethic. In contrast, references to past practices do not provide evidence to substantiate claims about present-day outcomes or behaviors related to allowances, thus rendering this statement irrelevant.

Other options, however, are directly relevant to the topic at hand, discussing issues like financial management and its educational implications, or behavioral outcomes related to incentives and work ethic, all of which effectively support or explain the arguments regarding allowances.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy