Which of the following is NOT an example of an argument?

The choice indicating that video games are a waste of time does not constitute an argument because it merely presents an opinion without providing supporting evidence or reasoning to back it up. An argument typically consists of a claim that is supported by reasons and evidence, which strengthens the assertion made. In contrast, the assertion that video games are a waste of time lacks the elaboration, rationale, or data that would categorize it as an argumentative statement.

In the other options, statements like video games improving critical thinking skills and parents needing to monitor gaming habits present claims along with implications that call for further discussion or support, which are characteristic of arguments. The statement that video games are not a real form of art also falls within the framework of an argument because it engages with a broader discussion about the definition and nature of art, suggesting the need for justification. Therefore, the selection that identifies video games as a waste of time is simply a declarative statement lacking the depth and structure of an argument.