Which of the following is a valid argument?

The statement that video games cannot be considered works of art serves as a valid argument because it presents a definitive opinion about the nature of video games in relation to art. This assertion can be debated and analyzed, leading to supportive or opposing viewpoints, which characterizes a valid argument. Such an argument encourages discourse regarding the criteria that define art and the role of video games in that context.

The other statements, while they may reflect commonly accepted beliefs or observations, do not present a position that invites argumentation or debate. They are more factual or descriptive in nature, lacking the argumentative quality necessary to engage critically with the subject matter. Therefore, the assertion about video games not being works of art stands out as a statement that invites discussion and differing perspectives, making it a valid argument.